Comments on: Populism, Terrorism and the Supreme Court http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/ Musings on India, the law, and policy Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:26:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: LEGAL NEWS 28-29.01.2009 « Advocate Kamal Kumar Pandey http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-208 LEGAL NEWS 28-29.01.2009 « Advocate Kamal Kumar Pandey Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:38:39 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-208 [...] gives and interesting analysis on the ‘Right against Terror’ here. I also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...] [...] gives and interesting analysis on the ‘Right against Terror’ here. I also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...]

]]> By: Interfering in the ‘Security of the State’ « The Social Blog http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-207 Interfering in the ‘Security of the State’ « The Social Blog Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:17:21 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-207 [...] also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...] [...] also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...]

]]> By: Interfering in the ‘Security of the State’ : Something About The Law http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-206 Interfering in the ‘Security of the State’ : Something About The Law Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:16:49 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-206 [...] also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...] [...] also have written here that the petition rests on the rationale that there is a Constitutional duty of the State to [...]

]]> By: Aditya http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Aditya Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:30:00 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-165 Sorry about that. Sadly I could not bring out the criticism in layman's language. I have tried to do so in the other posts of mine. The point is, that this issue of terrorism has become quite emotional and the only rational way I felt that I could've countered this is by the legal route. Sorry about that. Sadly I could not bring out the criticism in layman’s language. I have tried to do so in the other posts of mine.

The point is, that this issue of terrorism has become quite emotional and the only rational way I felt that I could’ve countered this is by the legal route.

]]> By: lvs http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-164 lvs Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:48:25 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-164 you lawyers use very difficult language, after reading this article twice i still dont think I understand it very well :) you lawyers use very difficult language, after reading this article twice i still dont think I understand it very well :)

]]> By: lvs http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-163 lvs Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:47:43 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-163 I dont understand this very well. But isnt the judiciary as the third arm of a democratic set up equally responsible? many of the terrorists now in Pak, were once in Indian jails and were there without trial or sometimes even without charges being filed. Judicial reform is a must. However, perhaps Sorabjee is asking for the judiciary to reform the executive? Well that is an entirely different matter I guess. I dont understand this very well. But isnt the judiciary as the third arm of a democratic set up equally responsible? many of the terrorists now in Pak, were once in Indian jails and were there without trial or sometimes even without charges being filed. Judicial reform is a must.

However, perhaps Sorabjee is asking for the judiciary to reform the executive? Well that is an entirely different matter I guess.

]]> By: Rajendran http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2008/12/12/populism-terrorism-and-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-162 Rajendran Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:08:19 +0000 http://thesocialblog.wordpress.com/?p=270#comment-162 I too subscribe to this view. As a matter of fact one could not get any materials from the writ petition filed by Shri.Sorabjee, which is available in the link below: http://lawyersclubindia.com/forum/messages/2008/12/3656_soli_sorabjee_s_pil_on_counter_terrorism.asp I too subscribe to this view. As a matter of fact one could not get any materials from the writ petition filed by Shri.Sorabjee, which is available in the link below:

http://lawyersclubindia.com/forum/messages/2008/12/3656_soli_sorabjee_s_pil_on_counter_terrorism.asp

]]>