<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A question of Moral Turpitude ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/02/05/a-question-of-moral-turpitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/02/05/a-question-of-moral-turpitude/</link>
	<description>Musings on India, the law, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocating Human Dignity and Morality : Something About The Law</title>
		<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/02/05/a-question-of-moral-turpitude/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocating Human Dignity and Morality : Something About The Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/?p=438#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] this earlier post, I have talked about morality and the Dworkinian conception of harm and the enjoyment of rights. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this earlier post, I have talked about morality and the Dworkinian conception of harm and the enjoyment of rights. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Question of Moral Turpitude ? (Part II) &#171; The Social Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/02/05/a-question-of-moral-turpitude/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>A Question of Moral Turpitude ? (Part II) &#171; The Social Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/?p=438#comment-219</guid>
		<description>[...] previous post correctly states my view on this subject. However, no critique of an issue would be justified [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previous post correctly states my view on this subject. However, no critique of an issue would be justified [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Question of Moral Turpitude ? (Part II) : Something About The Law</title>
		<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/02/05/a-question-of-moral-turpitude/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>A Question of Moral Turpitude ? (Part II) : Something About The Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/?p=438#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] previous post correctly states my view on this subject. However, no critique of an issue would be justified [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previous post correctly states my view on this subject. However, no critique of an issue would be justified [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

