<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towards Permanent Solutions in Kashmir.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/12/23/towards-permanent-solutions-in-kashmir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/12/23/towards-permanent-solutions-in-kashmir/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/12/23/towards-permanent-solutions-in-kashmir/comment-page-1/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/?p=1118#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>Pakistan has to go for a troop build-up in South Waziristan, if the offensive is to be complete and successful. Any failure, minor or not, is going to be a huge morale loss to the Pak Army/ establishment. For this purpose, the troops stationed along the LoC have to be moved and allocated to S. Waz accordingly. However, that can happen only if there&#039;s some assurance/ semblance of negotiation on the Indian front. Realpolitik mandates that India seize the opportunity to use this leverage against Pakistan at a time when they dont really want to send their LoC troops elsewhere, but have no option. At the same time, the Pakistan Taliban in South Waz poses a huge security threat to India as well. So a negotiation can only result in a win-win situation, i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan has to go for a troop build-up in South Waziristan, if the offensive is to be complete and successful. Any failure, minor or not, is going to be a huge morale loss to the Pak Army/ establishment. For this purpose, the troops stationed along the LoC have to be moved and allocated to S. Waz accordingly. However, that can happen only if there&#8217;s some assurance/ semblance of negotiation on the Indian front. Realpolitik mandates that India seize the opportunity to use this leverage against Pakistan at a time when they dont really want to send their LoC troops elsewhere, but have no option. At the same time, the Pakistan Taliban in South Waz poses a huge security threat to India as well. So a negotiation can only result in a win-win situation, i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/2009/12/23/towards-permanent-solutions-in-kashmir/comment-page-1/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethingaboutthelaw.com/?p=1118#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>Ref: to last para,
But is it possible to achieve any fruitful negotiation when Pak is &#039;in a dire internal situation&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ref: to last para,<br />
But is it possible to achieve any fruitful negotiation when Pak is &#8216;in a dire internal situation&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
