Dada Mail
»
The Legal Newswire
»
Archives
»
Legal Newswire/Issue 23/ September
The Legal Newswire
|
| Tuesday, 07/09/2010 |
|
Good
morning.
Here's
the
Latest
Legal
News
|
|
|
Rights groups slam RBI Stand on Class Action Suits
|
|
Consumer
rights activists have strongly criticised the Reserve Bank of India's
(RBI's) suggestion that banks be excluded from the purview of "class
action suits" in the new Companies Bill. Companies Bill 2009, which was
introduced in Parliament last year, has proposed to empower
shareholders'
associations or groups of shareholders to take legal action in case of
any fraud by a company, through class action suits.
A class action is a form of lawsuit where a large group of people
collectively bring a claim to court, and is a deterrent for frauds.
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay Accident Victim for Future Loss of Income:SC |
|
If
a person suffers permanent disability in an accident caused by a
vehicle, the compensation due to him should be computed taking into
account not only the victim's present earnings but also future loss of
income, Supreme Court has ruled.
The SC distinguished between claim for damages and compensation and
said damages were given for an injury whereas compensation stood on a
slightly higher footing.
|
|
|
Permanent Establishment Significant for Foreign COs
Companies
|
|
The
Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) signed between India and
other countries determine the tax liability of a foreign enterprise in
India. As a matter of fact the provision of DTAA’s which India has
signed with other countries, e.g. tax treaty with South Africa will
supersede the domestic tax law of India and Africa.
Provisions of Indian Income Tax Act can of course be applied, but only
if and when they are more beneficial to the assessee compared to the
provisions of the treaty. This is an internationally accepted legal
position, which has also been confirmed in a large number of court
decisions in India (see Azadi Bachao Andolan 263 ITR 706)........
|
|
|
Taxing Tangible Marketing
|
|
A
court order helps the taxman go after the money paid by local firms to
overseas parents towards brand royalty
Get as good as you give — this is what the Delhi High Court is telling
Indian subsidiaries of foreign firms.
In July 2010, it passed a landmark ruling that has significant
implications for foreign firms that have consumer facing brands in the
Indian market. These firms usually collect a royalty from their Indian
subsidiaries for using their brands. The High Court ruling now puts a
check on any “exorbitant” royalty payout. It has an even more
subversive effect. The ruling says that because huge sales from the
Indian market effectively ‘boost’ the value of the foreign brand, the
Indian subsidiary should get paid by its foreign owner for this ‘brand
enhancement’......
|
|
|
Mirror unto Ourselves
|
|
Pratap
BHanu
Mehta's
editorial
on
the
Liberhan Commission report in the Indian
Express.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Featured
Articles
|
 |
| Economic Times |
| Policy best left to Us: PM |
|
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh gave vent to his unease over judiciary’s
tendency to overstep the line, when he said tha courts should not get
into the realm of policymaking.
Answering a query on the Supreme Court’s direction to distribute grain
to the poor free of cost, during an interaction with editors, he said
that while he respected the sentiments behind the court’s observations,
the handling of the issue should be left to the executive
|
|
|
| VK Krishna Iyer |
| Who wil Judge the Judges ? |
|
Parliament
should
wake up and implement glasnost and perestroika in the judiciary.
In the name of independence, we cannot have judicial absolutism and
tyranny.
Most of the judges of the Supreme Court of India are those who were
previously senior judges in High Courts. There is no valid ground to
sustain any discrimination among judges of the Supreme Court and the
High Courts in the matter of their age of retirement. There is justice
in eliminating the differential age for retirement of the robed
brethren of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. An anomaly is now
being corrected.
|
|
|
| Bibek Debroy |
| An Indian version of Court Packing |
|
Avin
Chhangani
directs
me to a newspaper column written by Justice Krishna
Iyer. This is what Justice Iyer says: "Judges must have a political
philosophy... Our socialist, secular, democratic republic must appoint
only judges who share the political philosophy of the Constitution,
since judges are under the Constitution, not above it... Our
Constitution, which you are bound to uphold, is expressly socialist and
secular. So you have a socialist commitment. If you disown it, you
violate your oath, and must go."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments?
Questions?
Tips?
Send
e-mail
to
aditya@somethingaboutthelaw.com
|
| © 2009 Somethingaboutthelaw.com, All
rights reserved. |
|
|
|
|
| Contact us |
NALSAR University of Law
|
|
|
|
|
(archive
rss
,
atom
)
A periodical update of the latest legal news and developments.
Powered by Dada Mail 4.0.4 Stable Install DadaMail web hosting
Copyright © 1999-2008, Simoni Creative.