Something About The Law

Musings Pertinent to Law and Society

The Economic Crisis as a Poll Plank in India.

Posted by Arun On May - 7 - 2009

Recently, the New York Times published the results of a survey (conducted by Harris Interactive for the International Herald Tribune and France 24) on the rise of political extremism in Western Democracies during the financial meltdown. An overwhelming majority of people surveyed (65% in Britain & Germany; 53% in the U.S and Italy; 60% in Spain) is of the view that political extremism is “certain to happen” or “probable” in the next three years.

Clearly, most people might differ on the manifestation of such extremism that they portend in the near future, but the survey results indicate the high levels of involvement of citizens in these countries on the global economic crisis.

Compare the extant situation to that in India, where the world’s largest democracy has gone into labour, and is expected to give birth to a new government in a few days. However, the meltdown has hardly figured as a crucial electoral issue, and none of the political parties seem keen to 1. tackle the issue by its horns or 2. use it as a poll plank.

My deductions in this regard have mostly been based on what I see on electronic and print media; the issue of economic security could well have been addressed by candidates in their respective constituencies. Nonetheless, isn’t the problem a national issue, based on policy, as opposed to grassroot solutions? Little or no airtime has been spent by channels in covering the matter; very few articles appear on the same in print.

While political alliances may be at fault in skirting the issue, the electorate is not too far behind. Mumbai, the commercial capital of India, registered a turnout of 46-7%. Much has been made of the urban middle-class being completely apathetic to the electoral process itself; that segment of society where the economic crisis will hurt most.

Instead the elections (at the national level) have become a question as to who is a better Prime Minister, where candidates, voters and the media have judged by personality, as opposed to core issues. While I don’t intend to be the prophet of doom here, we can hardly afford to complain if we are responsible for a government which is completely unprepared for the worst in recent economic memory.

Interview with Mr. JM Lyngdoh

Posted by Aditya On January - 12 - 2009

Arun and I had an exclusive interview with Mr. JM Lyngdoh (Former Election Commissioner) after his lecture at NALSAR. Below is the transcript of the interview. The issues covered in this interview were;

- Private Funding of Elections

- Student Elections

- The 49-O debate

- Voting solutions and accommodations for the Middle Class

- Elections in Chattisgarh

The podcast of the interview may be downloaded here.

Arun : My first question is with regard to the issue of private funding that you raised. Sir you had drawn a comparison with the United States perspective where in there would be private funding in election campaigns. Can you think of any particular evil of introducing it in India ?

Mr. Lyngdoh : Let me make it quite clear. It is not private funding that is the greatest problem in the tracking of funding in India. The main source of funding in election campaigns is government funding and the stemming of it should be the main focus. This source of funding is highly objectionable; whether from a literal point of view or from a normal point of view.

Arun : Would you then perhaps encourage corporate entities or industrialists in funding and having their say in financing election campaigns ?

Mr. Lyngdoh : Believe me, the corporate sector is even more unreliable than the government when it comes to election campaigns. I don’t want them to be a part of it.

Read the rest of this entry »